Epic Games CEO on why the company lost to Apple but secured a big win over Google
Epic Games CEO on why the company lost to Apple but secured a big win over Google
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney discussed the company's antitrust battles against Apple and Google. Sweeney attributed Epic's victory against Google to deleted records and a jury's verdict. He highlighted Google's alleged deletion of key records and chats about preferential deals with developers as impacting the case significantly. Sweeney also emphasized the difference in trial formats, with the Apple case decided by a judge and the Google case going to a jury. The Epic Games vs Google antitrust case focused on allegations of Google's practices constituting an illegal monopoly.
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney discussed the company's antitrust battles against Apple and Google. Sweeney attributed Epic's victory against Google to deleted records and a jury's verdict. He highlighted Google's alleged deletion of key records and chats about preferential deals with developers as impacting the case significantly. Sweeney also emphasized the difference in trial formats, with the Apple case decided by a judge and the Google case going to a jury. The Epic Games vs Google antitrust case focused on allegations of Google's practices constituting an illegal monopoly.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you relevant advertising. To find out more, read our updated privacy policy and cookie policy
Through RSS Feeds 
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney discussed the company's antitrust battles against Apple and Google. Sweeney attributed Epic's victory against Google to deleted records and a jury's verdict. He highlighted Google's alleged deletion of key records and chats about preferential deals with developers as impacting the case significantly. Sweeney also emphasized the difference in trial formats, with the Apple case decided by a judge and the Google case going to a jury. The Epic Games vs Google antitrust case focused on allegations of Google's practices constituting an illegal monopoly. 
