Corporate advocacy on Carbon Capture at odds with scientific consensus, InfluenceMap Study Reveals
Corporate advocacy on Carbon Capture at odds with scientific consensus, InfluenceMap Study Reveals
In a groundbreaking study, InfluenceMap reveals concerning disparities between corporate advocacy on carbon capture and established scientific principles. The study scrutinized 750 instances of corporate engagement, involving 500 global companies and 250 industry associations. Sofia Basheer, the lead researcher at InfluenceMap, highlights the shift in focus from undermining public trust in climate change science to sowing confusion about climate change solutions.
In a groundbreaking study, InfluenceMap reveals concerning disparities between corporate advocacy on carbon capture and established scientific principles. The study scrutinized 750 instances of corporate engagement, involving 500 global companies and 250 industry associations. Sofia Basheer, the lead researcher at InfluenceMap, highlights the shift in focus from undermining public trust in climate change science to sowing confusion about climate change solutions.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you relevant advertising. To find out more, read our updated privacy policy and cookie policy
Through RSS Feeds 
In a groundbreaking study, InfluenceMap reveals concerning disparities between corporate advocacy on carbon capture and established scientific principles. The study scrutinized 750 instances of corporate engagement, involving 500 global companies and 250 industry associations. Sofia Basheer, the lead researcher at InfluenceMap, highlights the shift in focus from undermining public trust in climate change science to sowing confusion about climate change solutions. 
